Photo of Corey I. Rogoff

Corey Rogoff is an associate in the Litigation Department, specializing in a range of business, regulatory and investigative matters. He has extensive experience advising on securities issues, including federal securities class actions, shareholder derivative lawsuits, and internal and governmental investigations. Corey has also worked in defense of private and government antitrust actions involving price fixing, supply restraints and monopolization allegations.

Corey is also part of the litigation team that represents the Financial Oversight and Management Board in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s bankruptcy proceedings and the historic restructuring of Puerto Rico’s debts. He has leveraged his experience to advise the Board on the implications of pending legislation, regulatory actions and executive orders.

Corey also maintains an active pro bono practice, with a focus on immigration law and criminal record expungement. He is part of a team working with 100+ Meridian Heights residents in bringing a multi-year, class action lawsuit against the owners and property managers for terrible living conditions. Corey and the team recently received one of Proskauer’s Golden Gavel Awards in recognition of their efforts to successfully resolve this litigation.

SPACs remain on everyone’s mind, especially the country’s chief regulator.  On May 26, 2021, SEC Chair Gary Gensler testified before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government on “key capital market trends” that will impact SEC resources in the coming years. And the very first topic he raised – Initial Public Offerings and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies – was of no surprise to most market watchers.

If 2020 was the “Year of the SPAC,” 2021 may be turning into the year of the SPAC class action. We have already followed numerous cases where recently formed SPACs have been challenged in federal court for alleged violations of federal securities laws. Although those cases are still pending, a district court recently delivered a notable ruling on a SPAC created far in the distant past, as far as SPACs are concerned: 2017.

SPACs seem to be having their moment in the financial world, especially in 2021.  In less than three months, U.S.-based SPACs have raised more money – almost $88 billion – than all SPACs combined in 2020 (which held the previous high for SPAC investment by some margin).  They have even reached a level of societal notoriety, as shown by this week’s cover of New York Magazine.  However, before SPACs and their supporters can carry this trend “to the moon,” the SEC chose this week to release two notices bringing SPAC fans back to earth.

Private companies with cutting-edge technology have become particularly attractive targets for special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). These private companies may choose to go public via SPAC for a number of reasons that include the ability to share projections with investors, better valuation prospects and deal execution certainty. Much like companies that go public by way of a traditional IPO, however, companies that go public via SPAC can also become subject to Section 10(b) securities class actions. The risk for this type of company may be particularly acute given its high growth prospects or the volatility that may accompany its securities. An example of a company that went public via SPAC that was quickly confronted with this type of action is Velodyne.

In the financial world, 2020 was the year of the SPAC. During the past few years, many Silicon Valley start-ups were chomping at the bit to get listed and cash out via initial public offering (IPO). And in 2020, over half of the companies that went public did so using a SPAC. Exchanges are also getting in on the fun, with at least three SPAC ETFs hitting the stock exchange in the past few months.