Representatives of asset managers often take up positions on the boards of portfolio companies. We have written posts before on some of the litigation and regulatory risks that can arise, both for the asset managers and the individuals including: Portfolio Company Risk: Plaintiffs Set Sights on Sponsors and Board Directors,
portfolio company
Regulatory And Litigation Hot Topics For Private Funds In 2016
Private investment funds are likely to face increased regulatory scrutiny and litigation risk in 2016, not only based on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s focus on the industry but also due to transparency and compliance initiatives of limited partners and other market developments. We have highlighted several areas that should be on the top of every private fund sponsor’s list – and how to assess and manage the associated risks.
Managing Litigation Risk: Critical Questions for Private Equity Professionals Serving on Portfolio Company Boards
Private equity funds, and individuals affiliated with fund sponsors, are increasingly being named as defendants in lawsuits involving their portfolio companies. This litigation risk arises most frequently where a fund controls one or more board seats on the portfolio company, or where an individual affiliated with the fund sponsor serves as a senior executive at the portfolio company.
When a fund sponsor (or an individual affiliated with a fund sponsor) is named as a defendant in a lawsuit involving a portfolio company, the initial assessment of the claims, risks, insurance coverage, and indemnification rights is critical. Some of the key questions for that early assessment are:
- What are the board designee’s indemnity rights? Typically, the board designee has indemnity rights at multiple levels, including the portfolio company level, the fund level, and potentially the management company/sponsor level. The interplay between the rights at different levels, and the priority of the indemnitors’ obligations, requires careful assessment. Also, it is important to understand that an indemnity right is subject to “credit risk,” as the indemnity is only as strong as the balance sheet of the indemnitor.